Legal Opinion

Trautman v. Hokr

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1948No. L. A. 19588PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendants in these seven consolidated cases appeal from judgments by which it was “Adjudged and Decreed that defendants [named, respectively] . . . and all persons claiming, or to claim, through or under them, . . . not of the white or Caucasian race, be and they hereby are restrained and enjoined from using or occupying” certain specified parcels of real property owned or occupied by defendants and located in the Charles Victor Hall Tract in the city of Los Angeles, California.

The judgments are based upon findings of fact which, for the purposes of this opinion, may be summarized…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Fairchild v. RainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wayt v. PateeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. GaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. No Oil, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Davis v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API