Legal Opinion

Cassell v. Hickerson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1948No. L. A. No. 19685; L. A. No. 19523PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

These cases, like Cumings v. Hokr, ante, p. 844 [193 P.2d 742], Davis v. Carter, post, p. 870 [193 P.2d 744], and In re Laws, ante, p. 846 [193 P.2d 744], involve the legality and enforceability of privately imposed restrictions against occupation of certain lots of land by persons other than those of the Caucasian race. Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer and McGhee v. Sipes, May 3, 1948, 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed.-], 16 Law Week 4426 (see also Hurd v. Hodge, May 3, 1948, 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed.-]; 16 Law Week 4432), holding that such restrictions cannot be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Davis v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Davis v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Barrows v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Morin v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Clayton v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API