Legal Opinion

Barrows v. Jackson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 1952No. Civ. 18717PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

This appeal presents the question whether the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States forbids the maintenance in a state court of an action for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant prohibiting the use or occupancy of real property by non-Caucasians. Defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment which followed.

The facts alleged are these.

On October 21, 1944, three of the plaintiffs, the predecessor of the fourth, and the defendant, the owners of four parcels…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Civil Rights CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Abstract Investment Co. v. HutchinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Grange Co. v. SimmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Atlas Terminals, Inc. v. SokolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API