Legal Opinion

Cavett v. Butler

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1948No. L. A. No. 20255Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The above-entitled cases, like Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844 [193 P.2d 742]; Cassell v. Hickerson (1948), 31 Cal.2d 869 [193 P.2d 743]; Davis v. Carter (1948), 31 Cal.2d 870 [193 P.2d 744]; In re Laws (1948), 31 Cal.2d 846 [193 P.2d 744]; Clayton v. Wilkins, post, p. 895 [197 P.2d 162]; and Morin v. Crane, post, p. 896 [197 P.2d 162], involve the legality and enforceability of privately imposed restrictions against occupation of certain lots of land by persons other than those of the Caucasian race. In each of the instant cases the trial court enjoined occupancy of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API