ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Clements
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge.
Respondent, James F. Clements (Clements), excepts to findings and conclusions of Judge Robert C. Nalley that Clements had violated then governing Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4). See Maryland Rules (1986), Court Administration Rule 1230, Appendix F, Code of Professional Responsibility, Rule 1-102(A)(4). 1 In the refinancing of a mortgage on an office building, Clements, one of a group of investor-borrowers, did not personally and affirmatively disclose to the new lender an arguably effective, prior assignment of rents for security purposes which would not be released as part of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SilkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Frank v. StorerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Standard Finance Co. v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- VF Corp. v. Wrexham Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. NussbaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.