Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Edmunds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, C. J.

This is an action of forcible detainer, brought by Bertha Purcell against R. Harold Edmunds and N. Julienne Edmunds, his wife. From a judgment in favor of the defendants for costs and disbursements the plaintiff has appealed.

The complaint is in the ordinary form for such proceedings. The third amended answer to the complaint denies the allegations thereof and alleges that on July 18, 1942, Jesse E. Wise purchased from the plaintiff and her husband the property described in the complaint ; that the purchase price of the realty and certain personal property thereon, mostly furniture, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. WoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Twiss v. BoehmerOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scales v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bunch v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Bunch v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Aldrich v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Aldrich v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API