Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Woody

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1941PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an action under the forcible entry and detainer act (sections 8-301 to 8-328, O. C. L. A), to recover possession of certain real property in Multnomah county. The defendants are vendees in possession of the property under a contract to purchase and the plaintiffs are the vendors who contracted to sell and convey the property to the defendants. The ease is here upon an appeal from an order and judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the action. The ground of demurrer was that the complaint failed to state a cause of action.

The complaint sets forth the contract in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sommer v. ComptonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Twiss v. BoehmerOregon Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Modrok v. MarshallAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cummins Management, L.P. v. GilroyNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Christy Et Ux. v. Guild Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API