Legal Opinion
Cozzolino v. City of Fontana
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1955No. Civ. 5086PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
By a petition for a writ of mandate, filed on July 26, 1954, the petitioner sought reinstatement as a police officer for the city of Fontana. A demurrer was sustained with leave to amend, and an amended petition was filed. A demurrer was again sustained with leave to amend, and the petitioner filed notice of his election to stand on the amended petition. A judgment of dismissal was then entered, and this appeal followed.
So far as material here, the petition alleged that Fontana is a city of the sixth class; that petitioner was employed as a police officer for said city on October 21, 1952, by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dixon v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Hackler v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Chambers v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Keeley v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ball v. City Council of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Ivens v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lucas v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Estrada v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.