Legal Opinion
Hackler v. Ward
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1951No. Civ. 18052PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff filed a complaint entitled “Action for Damages for Wrongful Removal from Public Office.” Thereafter he filed an amended complaint to which a general demurrer was sustained and plaintiff allowed 20 days within which to amend. After plaintiff declined to amend, a judgment was entered in favor of defendants. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.
In the first cause of action of the amended complaint it is alleged in substance that plaintiff was a resident of the city of Fair Oaks, county of San Luis Obispo; that the city of Arroyo Grande is a city of the sixth class existing under and by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Boyd v. PendegastCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Good v. Common CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Jensen v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 85Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Jefferson County Board of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Healdsburg Police Officers Ass'n v. City of HealdsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ball v. City Council of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Carlson v. BrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Pranger v. BreakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.