Keeley v. City of Modesto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DEIRUP, J., pro tem.
Petitioner has appealed from a judgment denying a writ of mandate to reinstate him as captain of police after he had been discharged by the chief of police of Modesto. It is alleged in the petition that “said discharge was arbitrary and without cause and said petitioner was entitled and is now entitled to be employed by the City of Modesto as Captain of Police under the terms of the charter of the City of Modesto, and by law, and that his discharge was illegal and void”.
The charter in question gives the chief of police power “to suspend or remove any members of the police…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Matter of CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Neuwald v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Linberg v. StantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Livingstone v. MacGillivrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cozzolino v. City of FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Schneider v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955