State of Arizona v. Hon. butler/tyler B.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona’s implied consent statute, AR.S. § 28-1321, outlines how law enforcement officers can obtain consent to blood and breath tests from persons arrested for driving under the influence (“DUI”) and provides consequences for arrestees who refuse to submit to a test. Against this backdrop, we address whether the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that a juvenile arrestee’s consent be voluntary to allow a warrantless blood draw. We hold that it does and that the juvenile court properly ruled that evidence of a blood draw was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Mark GoudeauArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Dale Dean Pettijohn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Francisco L Encinas ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Flonnory v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.