State v. Don Jacob Havatone
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE BOLICK,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 This case considers the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 28-1321(C), the “unconscious clause,” which allows law enforcement officials to make or direct nonconsensual blood draws from unconscious DUI suspects. We hold that the provision is unconstitutional as applied to the facts of this case.
¶2 We also consider whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies here. Following a collision after which defendant was airlifted to Nevada, a blood draw was taken at the request of Arizona law enforcement officials, raising the question, unresolved…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. HoerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Benard PrimousArizona Supreme Court · 2017
- State of Arizona v. Courtney Noelle WeaklandArizona Supreme Court · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.