Legal Opinion

State v. George

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 13, 1994No. 92-659PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant seeks reversal of an order suspending his license, arguing that the district court erred in concluding that he had refused to submit to an evidentiary test. We affirm.

Section 1202(c) of Title 23 provides as follows:

A person who is requested by a law enforcement officer to submit to an evidentiary test has the right to consult an attorney before deciding whether or not to submit to such a test. The person must decide whether or not to submit to the evidentiary test within a reasonable time, but no later than 30 minutes from the time of the initial attempt to contact the attorney.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. State v. GarveySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Stockwell v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONTSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  4. Gilman v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles & Vermont District Court, Unit No. 3Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Fontaine v. District Court of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. State v. FredetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. State v. NemkovichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. State v. IronsideSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  5. State v. MaySupreme Court of Vermont · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API