Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles & Vermont District Court, Unit No. 3

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 5, 1990No. 89-019PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.

The record contains ample support for the conclusion that defendant refused to submit to a breath test within the meaning of 23 V.S.A. § 1202. To effect a refusal under 23 V.S.A. § 1202(c), a person need only conduct himself in a manner which would lead a reasonable person in the trooper’s position to believe that the person understood he was requested to submit to a breath test and manifested an unwillingness to do so. Stockwell v. District Court, 143 Vt. 45, 50, 460 A.2d 466, 469 (1983). A person need not show refusal by an express, affirmative statement. Id. at 50, 460 A.2d at 468. In the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stockwell v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONTSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GarveySupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. State v. MadonnaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. State v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  5. Gilman v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles & Vermont District Court, Unit No. 3Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API