State v. May
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. The State appeals from the district court’s order suppressing an evidentiary breath test and certain statements made by defendant to a University of Vermont (UVM) police officer during a roadside stop for speeding that resulted in an arrest and processing for DUI. The trial court suppressed the evidence because defendant had not been allowed to use his cell phone to call either his father or his attorney in Connecticut before deciding whether to take a preliminary breath test at roadside. The trial court held that failure to allow defendant to make the cell phone call was a flaw in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. StanislawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- State v. CarmodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. FredetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Therrien, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011