Legal Opinion

State v. Nemkovich

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1998No. 97-186 & 97-187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

In this DUI prosecution, the district court suppressed evidentiary breath test results in both the civil-license-suspension and criminal proceedings on grounds that the police had obtained an invalid waiver of defendant’s Miranda rights, thus tainting defendant’s subsequent written waiver of his right to counsel under the implied consent statute. The State brings interlocutory appeal of the suppression order in the criminal case and a direct appeal of judgment for defendant in the civil proceeding, both cases consolidated here. We reverse.

Upon notification that a vehicle was disabled on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. CarmodySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. State v. WestSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. StensonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. State v. RobitailleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. State v. Eileen EttoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API