Legal Opinion

Fontaine v. District Court of Vermont

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 13, 1988No. 86-099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Defendant appeals an order of the superior court entered on January 8, 1986, affirming a district court order that required the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to suspend defendant’s license to operate a motor vehicle for a period of six months because he refused to submit to alcohol testing. We affirm the district court’s order.

At the outset, we note that under our recent decision in Pfeil v. Rutland District Court, 147 Vt. 305, 308, 515 A.2d 1052, 1054-55 (1986), the superior court did not have jurisdiction over defendant’s appeal under V.R.C.P. 75. Nevertheless, because that court’s *29judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  3. State v. BreanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. State v. NashSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Pfeil v. Rutland District CourtSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re A.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  3. State v. BenwareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. In re A.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API