Legal Opinion
Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 13, 2002No. C1-02-291PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Relator petitioned for clarification of a collective-bargaining unit, requesting that certain part-time early childhood family education teachers be included within that local bargaining unit. A hearing officer denied relator’s petition for clarification. Relator argues that part-time early childhood family education teachers are “public employees” under Minn.Stat. § 179A.03, subd. 14 (2000) and therefore should be included in the bargaining unit. Because early childhood family education programs and courses are community education instruction offered on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Arlandson v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Olson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Educ. Mn-Chisholm v. Ind. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002