Legal Opinion
Olson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 2001No. CX-01-974PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Respondents sued appellant under several common-law and statutory theories, alleging that appellant improperly charged some insureds over the age of 65 for no-fault wage-loss coverage that, by law, the insureds could not receive under most circumstances. Appellant moved to dismiss respondents’ claims under several theories, but argued specifically that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Appellant challenges the denial of its motion to dismiss,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Neighborhood School Coalition v. Independent School District No. 279Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Hippe v. American Family Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Behr v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.