Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of J.R.Z.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 2002No. C4-01-1358PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
The district court denied appellant’s motion to stay adjudication for third-degree criminal sexual conduct, adjudicated appellant delinquent, and ordered him to register as a predatory sex offender and to complete a treatment program. Appellant argues the district court abused its discretion when it adjudicated him delinquent because the adjudication was not necessary for his rehabilitation, it did not serve his best interests, and the court applied the wrong law by requiring special circumstances or an abuse of prosecutorial discretion before it could stay…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. HumesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- In Re Registrant J.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- State v. FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, IN the INTEREST OF T.B., Respondent/Cross-PetitionerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- In Re the Welfare of M.J.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re C. S. N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Education Minnesota-Chisholm v. Independent School District No. 695Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.