Legal Opinion
Wieck v. Hockett
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 23, 1931No. Docket No. 4323PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant H. Hamaguchi from a judgment entered against him upon a verdict of a jury in the sum of $3,750 in‘a case for personal injuries.
Plaintiff Birdene Wieck, a minor, and W. A. Wieck, her father brought this action for damages against defendants, William Hockett and H. Hamaguchi, charging that Birdene Wieck was severely and permanently injured by reason of the negligent operation by said defendants of their respective automobiles. No judgment was entered against William Hockett.
The answer of H. Hamaguchi denies any negligence on his part, and as a separate…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Reneau v. HirschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mangino v. BonslettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Levy v. BernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Levens v. StoccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Elford v. HiltabrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Elford v. HiltabrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944