Legal Opinion

Elford v. Hiltabrand

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1944No. Civ. 14311Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 Cal.App.2d 65 (1944)

BLANCHE ELFORD et al., Respondents,

v.

MARY E. HILTABRAND, Appellant.

Civ. No. 14311.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One.

Feb. 29, 1944.

C. A. Pinkham and Schell & Delamer for Appellant.

Arthur C. Miller and Lee A. Solomon for Respondents.

WHITE, J.

Plaintiffs, who are mother and daughter, instituted this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of a rear end collision between two automobiles, both of which were proceeding in a general northerly direction along Highway No. 6, commonly known and referred to as the "Mint Canyon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Communist Party of United States of America v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Mogle v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API