Mangino v. Bonslett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial, after a verdict of a jury-in favor of defendant. The action is one for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident.
The order granting the new trial reads in part as follows: “The motion for a new trial in behalf of plaintiffs in the above-entitled case, coming on regularly to be heard, and said motion having been submitted to the court for decision, and the court having very carefully considered the points urged by counsel, and having a clear recollection of the con-, duct of the trial,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Lafargue v. United Railroad of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Williamson v. HardyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Arnold v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Keena v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wills v. JJ Newberry Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Minnick v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- M. P. Moller, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Weaver v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Ralph v. MacMarr StoresMontana Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.