Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Finkler

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1936No. S. F. 15631PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This appeal is taken by Christina A. Finkler, a half-sister of the deceased, and by Sumner J. Waite et al., heirs at law of said Henry C. Finkler, from an order made and entered by the Superior Court of the County of San Mateo in the above-entitled matter, directing that final distribution of the residue of the estate of decedent be made to M. J. Purcell and B. Grant Taylor, the executors and beneficiaries named in his will, excepting therefrom small sums of money ordered distributed to certain heirs at law as in said will provided.

The question as to what part, if any, of said document filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Whitten v. La PlanteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wolseley v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In Re Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peebler v. OldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Agdeppa v. GlougieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Estate of LopusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Norden v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Best v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API