Legal Opinion
Peebler v. Olds
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1945No. Civ. 14917PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From only that portion of the judgment assessing special damages resulting from the wrongful prosecution of civil suits, defendants appeal. They maintain that there is not sufficient proof of malice, of want of probable cause or of the special damages.
The facts undisputedly alleged and found are as follows: About 1923 plaintiffs and defendant Olds formed a partnership which owned and operated a cemetery known as the Olive Lawn Memorial Park on five acres which will be here in after referred to as “Memorial Park.” In 1932 they drilled a well to provide water for their cemetery but…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hurgren v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Michael J. Von Brimer, Co-Executors of the Estate of Joseph W. Von Brimer, Deceased v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Sumner Hill Homeowners' Ass'n v. Rio Mesa Holdings, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Contra Costa County Title Co. v. WaloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.