Legal Opinion

Whitten v. La Plante

California Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 7938PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for partial distribution. William Parsons died, leaving a last will and testament which was duly admitted to probate, without objection or contest, and letters testamentary thereon were issued. In due course, Wilfred Whitten, Muriel Whitten, and Oliver Whitten filed a petition for partial distribution, alleging themselves to be legatees under the will, and each entitled to one thousand dollars. The respondent executor denied the claims of the petitioners and filed objections to the granting of the petition on the ground that the provisions of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Pearson v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In re Estate of PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In re Estate of MaxwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Salmonski v. BardzinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Estate of PlautCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Burnett v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Low v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API