Legal Opinion

Scruggs v. . Rollins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

The question involved: Did the court below err in refusing to vacate the restraining order against the county commis sioners of Rutherford County, North Carolina, from issuing and delivering $163,000 in bonds and in continuing same until the final hearing? We think not.

In Hermic v. Commissioners of Yadkin, 206 N. C., 845 (847), it is said: “The only question presented by this appeal is whether a'bond order passed by the board of commissioners of a county in this State, under the authority and subject to the provisions of the County Finance Act (Public Laws of North Carolina, 1927, ch. 81, N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. New Hope Realty Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Hemric v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API