Scruggs v. . Rollins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.
The question involved: Did the court below err in refusing to vacate the restraining order against the county commis sioners of Rutherford County, North Carolina, from issuing and delivering $163,000 in bonds and in continuing same until the final hearing? We think not.
In Hermic v. Commissioners of Yadkin, 206 N. C., 845 (847), it is said: “The only question presented by this appeal is whether a'bond order passed by the board of commissioners of a county in this State, under the authority and subject to the provisions of the County Finance Act (Public Laws of North Carolina, 1927, ch. 81, N.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- New Hope Realty Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hemric v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Little v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935