Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Frazier v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1927PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1ConcurrenceClarkson, J.

Controversy without action submitted to the Superior Court of Guilford County upon statement of facts agreed. C. S., 626.

The question in difference between the parties to this controversy involves the validity of bonds which defendant, board of commissioners of Guilford County, proposes to issue as obligations of said county, pursuant to orders made by said board, under the provisions of "The County Finance Act," ch. 81, Public Laws 1927.

Defendant has ordered that bonds of Guilford County be issued pursuant to said act, and unless restrained and enjoined from so doing, will issue bonds of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Carr v. CokeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Commissioners of Stanly County v. SnuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Mebane Graded School District v. County of AlamanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Martin v. . Comrs. of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Moore v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Fuller v. . LockhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API