Legal Opinion

Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1927PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The rights of the parties to the controversy are complicated. Certain principles of law are applicable when the facts are ascertained. On the record, as to material facts, there is serious conflict. In injunction proceedings this Court has the power to find and review the findings of fact on appeal, but the burden is on the appellant to assign and show error, and there is a presumption that the judgment and proceedings in the court below are correct.

Plaintiff hás given bond, in accordance with the order continuing the injunction to the hearing, “conditioned upon his saving the defeirdants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heilig and Others v. . Stokes and PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  2. Harrington v. Rawls.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. McCorkle v. . BremSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Teeter v. . TeeterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Boushiar v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API