Legal Opinion

New Hope Realty Co. v. Barnes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The plaintiff contends that the question involved: “Is this covenant of such a nature as to justify a restraint of its violation until all questions of fact relating thereto can be determined?” ¥e think so.

Ordinarily, the right to injunctive relief to compel the observance of covenants and restraintive clauses, is recognized in this jurisdiction. Church v. Bragaw, 144 N. C., 126; Guilford v. Porter, 161 N. C., 366; Bradshaw v. Millikin, 173 N. C., 432; Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 589; Nye v. Williams, 190 N. C., 129.

In Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., at p. 34, it is said: “On the record, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Beacom v. AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Franzle v. WatersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Cullins v. . State CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Cullins v. North Carolina State College of Agriculture & EngineeringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Scruggs v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API