New Hope Realty Co. v. Barnes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
The plaintiff contends that the question involved: “Is this covenant of such a nature as to justify a restraint of its violation until all questions of fact relating thereto can be determined?” ¥e think so.
Ordinarily, the right to injunctive relief to compel the observance of covenants and restraintive clauses, is recognized in this jurisdiction. Church v. Bragaw, 144 N. C., 126; Guilford v. Porter, 161 N. C., 366; Bradshaw v. Millikin, 173 N. C., 432; Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 589; Nye v. Williams, 190 N. C., 129.
In Wentz v. Land Co., 193 N. C., at p. 34, it is said: “On the record, as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Bradshaw v. . MillikinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Beacom v. AmosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Castle v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Franzle v. WatersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Cullins v. . State CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Cullins v. North Carolina State College of Agriculture & EngineeringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Scruggs v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.