Legal Opinion

Hemric v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNnoe, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a bond order passed by the board of commissioners of a county in this State, under the authority and subject to the provisions of the County Finance Act (Public Laws of North Carolina, 1927, chap. 81, North Carolina Code of 1931, chap. 24, Art. 7A) authorizing and directing the issuance of bonds of the county for the purpose of procuring money to be expended in the purchase, construction, improvement and equipment of schoolhouses in the several school districts of the county, which are necessary for the maintenance of public schools in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Julian v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. WatersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hall v. . Commissioners of DuplinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Twining v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Castevens v. . Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Scruggs v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API