Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1929No. 12,145PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The Industrial Commission sued The Continental Investment Company to recover the penalty prescribed in sections 4491 and 4492, C. L. To review the judgment in favor of the company, the commission brings the case here on writ of error.

Section 4491 is as follows: “If any employer or insurer, or any officer or agent of either, or any employe, or any other person shall violate any provision of this act, or shall do any act prohibited thereby, or shall fail or refuse to perform any duty lawfully enjoined, within the time prescribed by the commission, for which no penalty has been specifically…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Oklahoma Operating Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. Dushek v. WatlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Continental Investment Co. v. GarcherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Myron Stratton HomeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Jiminez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Jiminez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API