Legal Opinion

Jiminez v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02CA2283Published

1Opinion of the Court

107 P.3d 965 (2003)

Maxie JIMINEZ, Petitioner,

v.

INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE OF the STATE OF COLORADO, Pinnacol Assurance, and Amax Henderson Project, Respondents.

No. 02CA2283.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

September 11, 2003.

Roger Fraley, Jr., Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent Industrial Claim Appeals Office.

Ruegsegger Thomas, LLC, Douglas A. Thomas, Merrily S. Archer, Denver, Colorado, for Respondents Pinnacol Assurance and Amax Henderson Project.

Opinion by Judge CASEBOLT.

Maxie Jiminez (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lockett v. GarrettColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Ogden v. McChesneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Pueblo School District No. 70 v. TothColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API