Legal Opinion

Jiminez v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 2003No. 02CA2283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

Maxie Jiminez (claimant) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) denying his claim for penalties against employer, Amax Henderson Project, and its insurer, Pinnacol Assurance (collectively Pinnacol). We affirm.

In an underlying order in 2000, an administrative law judge (ALJ) found Pinnacol liable to claimant for additional temporary total disability (TTD) benefits beyond what it had previously paid. The ALJ also imposed penalties for late payment of TTD benefits.

Pinnacol filed a timely petition to review the order, alleging that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ogden v. McChesneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. City & County of Denver v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Pueblo School District No. 70 v. TothColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. BCW Enterprises, Ltd. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paint Connection Plus v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Pioneers Hospital of Rio Blanco County v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Fera v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Jiminez v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API