Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Dushek v. Watland
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1924PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
This is an action to enforce an award of the Workmen's Compensation Bureau, in favor of the relator and against the defendants, in the sum of $2,543.00. ' ' '
The award was made under § 11 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws 1919, chap. 162) which reads:
‘Employers subject to this Act, who shall fail to comply with the provisions of Sections six and seven hereof, shall not be entitled to the benefits-of this Act during the period of such non-compliance, but shall be liable to their employees for damages suffered by reason of injuries sustained in the course of employment, and also to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Union Indemnity Co. v. SalingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. E.W. Wylie Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Jewel Tea Co. v. State Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Minot Special School District Number One v. OlsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.