Continental Investment Co. v. Garcher

This is the second visit of this case to this court. See Industrial Commission v. Continental Investment Co., 78 Colo. 399, 242 Pac. 49. We there held that G-archer was an employee of the Continental Investment Company by virtue of C. L. § 4423, and reversed the judgment of the district court which held the contrary. The commission then had further hearings and rendered a supplemental award August 27, 1926, which allowed fifteen dollars per week (including the fifty per cent additional for non-insurance) from September 7, 1924, to July 31, 1925, $100 to attorneys, and for medical and hospital…