Tillery v. Meadows Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Steele Hays, Justice.
Appellee, Meadows Construction Company, began work on an apartment complex on a tract of land joined on three sides by single family homes. Appellants, twenty-two of those adjoining homeowners, sought an injunction claiming the notice requirements of the zoning ordinance were not complied with. The Chancellor denied injunctive relief and appellants bring this appeal. We affirm.
Appellants’ principal contention is they were not given the required notice of a planning commission hearing on zoning changes which adversely affected their property. They cite Ark. Stat. Ann. §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- City of North Little Rock v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Davis v. SchimmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Grant v. A. B. Leach & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carmical v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Rolling Pines Ltd. Partnership v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Fortier v. City of SpearfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Fortier v. City of SpearfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.