Legal Opinion
Fortier v. City of Spearfish
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1988No. 16089Published
1Opinion of the Court
433 N.W.2d 228 (1988)
Arthur R. FORTIER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SPEARFISH, Defendant and Appellee.
No. 16089.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Argued September 1, 1988.
Decided December 7, 1988.
Reed C. Richards, Deadwood, for plaintiff and appellant.
John J. Delaney, Rapid City, for defendant and appellee.
Michael G. Diedrich of City Attorney's Office, Rapid City, for amicus curiae City of Rapid City.
HEEGE, Circuit Judge.
Arthur Fortier (Fortier) appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action. The trial court held that the City of Spearfish's (Spearfish)…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re Neglect & Dependency of D.T.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State Theatre Co. v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.