Legal Opinion

Rolling Pines Ltd. Partnership v. City of Little Rock

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 2001No. CA 00-165PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. Jennings, Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of J a conditional use permit. For reversal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in its interpretation of certain city ordinances; that the trial court failed to apply recognized presumptions and standards that accompany conditional uses; and that the trial court erred in concluding that one of the ordinances was not unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.

Appellant, Rolling Pines Limited Partnership, is engaged in the development of the Rolling Pines subdivision in southwest Little Rock. The subdivision is zoned R-2,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Craft v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Anderson v. City of IssaquahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Blundell v. City of West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Benton County Stone Co. v. Benton County Planning BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Bolen v. Washington County Zoning Board of AdjustmentsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Hause v. City of Fayetteville, ArkansasDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2025
  4. Hause v. City of Fayetteville, ArkansasDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2024
  5. Jason Aamodt v. City of Norfork, ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API