Legal Opinion

PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 9, 2013No. C072107CV; A142268; C072107CV; A142301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.

These consolidated cases involve claims related to the allegedly negligent construction of a hotel. Plaintiff PIH Beaverton, the current owner of the hotel, brought a negligent-construction claim against Super One, a general contractor, and various subcontractors (collectively, “defendants”). Super One, in turn, sought indemnity from two subcontractors: (I) Gary Thompson dba Portland Plastering Company (Portland Plastering), via a cross-claim, and (2) Wood Mechanix, Inc., via third-party claims.1 Defendants moved for summary judgment against plaintiff’s negligence claim, and the trial court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Shasta View Irrigation District v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Black v. ArizalaOregon Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Shell v. Schollander CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API