Legal Opinion

PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2014No. CC C072107CV; CA A142268, A142301; SC S061488, S061505PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

In this case, we consider the meaning of the term “substantial completion” as used in ORS 12.135, a statute of ultimate repose for claims arising from the construction, alteration, or repair of improvements to real property. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings.

The following facts are taken from the record on summary judgment and are undisputed. Defendant general contractor Super One, Inc., and various subcontractors, including defendant subcontractor T. T. & L. Sheet Metal, Inc., contracted with VIP’s Industries, Inc. and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Montara Owners Assn. v. La Noue Development, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Riverview Condominium Ass'n v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Shell v. Schollander Companies, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Sunset Presbyterian Church v. Brockamp & Jaeger, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. SOMERSETT OWNERS ASS'N VS. SOMERSETT DEV. CO., LTD.Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API