Legal Opinion

Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C. v. Stein

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1992No. 90-02-01058; CA A71264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*365JOSEPH, C. J.

Plaintiff, a law firm, brought this action to recover on defendant’s guaranty of the debt that his brother had incurred for legal services. Judgment was entered for defendant after atrial to the court. He raised 7 affirmative defenses and asserts that the judgment could properly be based on any of 5 of them.1

In June, 1988, Alexander Stein (Stein) executed a retainer agreement with plaintiff for legal services. His account was soon in arrears and, in September 1988, to ensure plaintiffs continued services, he assigned to plaintiff 71,500 shares of stock in In Focus Systems, Inc.2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hagen v. O'Connell, Goyak & BallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Federici Et Ux v. LehmanOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ethyl Corporation v. JalbertOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ketcham v. SellesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lieuallen Land & Livestock Corp. v. HeidenrichOregon Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosboro Lumber Co. v. ApselCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Sera Architects, Inc. v. Klahowya Condominium, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Stein v. Burt & Vetterlein, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Burt, Vetterlein & Bushnell, P.C. v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API