Legal Opinion

Hagen v. O'Connell, Goyak & Ball

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. A8109-05362; CA A29231PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

In 1976 plaintiff, an attorney, became a shareholder in the defendant legal professional corporation. In February, 1979, the directors and shareholders of the corporation met and discussed a means to evaluate the stock of the corporation and, also, a buy-sell provision which would apply to the stock of a shareholder on termination of employment. In 1980, plaintiff terminated his employment. In 1981, he brought an action seeking an appraisal and an accounting for the stock he held in the corporation and also seeking declaratory relief.

The trial court found, and we are bound by that finding,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. W. J. Seufert Land Co. v. GreenfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McClory v. GayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jacob v. Norris, McLaughlin & MarcusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi v. HowardNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Meehan v. SHAUGHNESSY COHENMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Cohen v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API