Legal Opinion

Ethyl Corporation v. Jalbert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1974PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is an action to recover on a written guaranty executed by defendants to guarantee the credit extended to Associated Supply Co. Defendants appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

The defendant Leo Jalbert was the principal owner and president of Associated Supply Co. Defendant Nadine Jalbert, his wife, was not an officer, director or stockholder of that company. On May 18, 1968, in consideration of credit extended by plaintiff to Associated Supply, defendants executed and delivered a written guaranty agreement to Ethyl which guaranteed payment to Ethyl of all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoffart v. Lindquist & Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State of Oregon v. VaughnOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. AcremantOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Smith v. Custom Micro, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Chevron Chemical Co. v. MechamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  5. Gintzler v. MelnickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API