Legal Opinion
National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 22, 1963No. Civ. No. 7094PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This case came on regularly for trial before the court, without jury; the parties appeared by their respective attorneys of record; and the court, having heard the evidence and argument of counsel, and having considered the briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by counsel, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I. The plaintiff is an Ohio corporation with its principal place of business in Tiffin, Ohio.
2. The defendant Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Company, a Connecticut corporation with its principal place…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Mumm v. Jacob E. Decker & SonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bussemer v. Artwire Creations, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- The National MacHinery Company v. The Waterbury Farrel Foundry & MacHine Company and Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964