Legal Opinion
The National MacHinery Company v. The Waterbury Farrel Foundry & MacHine Company and Textron, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 4, 1964No. 28525_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
337 F.2d 944
143 U.S.P.Q. 225
The NATIONAL MACHINERY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The WATERBURY FARREL FOUNDRY & MACHINE COMPANY and Textron,
Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 101, Docket 28525.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 26, 1964.
Decided Nov. 4, 1964.
H. F. McNenny, Cleveland, Ohio (John Hoxie, Harvey M. Brownrout and Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City and D. W. Farrington and Richey, McNenny & Farrington, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
Willis H. Taylor, Jr., New York City (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- Polymer Processes, Inc. v. Cadillac Plastic & Chemical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964