Legal Opinion
Crawford v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2006No. 04-CV-116PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
The appellant, George W. Crawford, appeals from the trial court’s orders denying him declaratory and injunctive relief and attorney’s fees and costs following a jury trial on his claim under the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act (“DCWPA” or “the Act”), D.C.Code § 1-615.51 et seq. (2001). 1 He asserts that the trial court erred in not awarding him declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as attorney’s fees and costs. Concluding that he has misconstrued the statute, we affirm.
I. The Factual Background.
The appellant, a former General Counsel of the D.C.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Sierminski v. Transouth Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wilburn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Freeman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Payne v. District of Columbia GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.