Legal Opinion
A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 17, 1995No. 228, Docket 94-7222PublishedCited by 189 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff A.R. Peter LaFond appeals from a judgment entered on February 17, 1994 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Alfred V. Covello, Judge), granting summary judgment in favor of defendant General Physics Services Corporation (“General Physics”). LaFond brought this action under Conn.Gen.Stat. § 31-51m, Connecticut’s whistleblower protection statute, alleging that he was wrongfully terminated from his employment at General Physics for reporting suspected violations of federal law to state and federal agencies. Section 31-51m…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by189 opinions
- Richard S. RASKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the WYATT COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Govan v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Navy Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Shallal v. Catholic Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
184 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.