Legal Opinion

Payne v. District of Columbia Government

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 7, 2013No. 11-7116PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Opinion filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

SENTELLE, Senior Circuit Judge:

Audrick Payne, who was discharged from his position as an elevator inspector for the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, sued the District and four supervisory employees for violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act (“DCWPA”), along with several other theories of liability. The district court granted judgment in favor of the defendants on all claims. Appellant…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Keith McGillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Baumann v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  5. McCormick v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API