Legal Opinion
Kallay's Inc. v. Katona
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 6, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
On May 29, 1963, the named defendant as the town clerk of Fairfield certified that the sale of alcoholic liquor under a package store permit for the premises at 973 Kings Highway, Fairfield, for which the plaintiff made application, was not prohibited by the local zoning ordinance. General Statutes § 30-44. On June 12, the named defendant revoked her certification in a letter to the liquor control commission on the advice of the town attorney that the zoning ordinance did prohibit such a use at that address. The plaintiff instituted this action in mandamus to compel the named defendant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Spiros v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- State Ex Rel. Haverback v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Hutchison v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Miller v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Barnini v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dolan v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Essex Leasing, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Cavalli v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Bendell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- MacAluso v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.